Strauss the overachiever

When England travelled to New Zealand for 2008/09, I didn’t realise that Andrew Strauss was on his way out. But then, I’d never thought of him much at all. That’s not to say I ever thought he was rubbish, he just wasn’t someone who I thought of much. I remember he had a good start, was around during some Ashes, was on the Warne highlight reel as one of his landmark wickets and liked to smack the ball through point. But for someone who had been around for so long, he was almost anonymous to me.

I think I would have picked out his image in a photo array, but it would have been touch and go.

The first time I realised there was something more to Strauss was that he moved to Hamilton to prepare for a Test series against New Zealand. It wasn’t that he moved to a place to prepare for a series, professional athletes do that now, but that he did it for New Zealand. Not a five Test series, or a series against the heavy hitters of world cricket, he did it for the team that series that some players treat more as a holiday than a proper series.

Strauss treated it more seriously than some of his team mates had treated the 06/07 Ashes.

It was from then on in I started taking more notice of Strauss.

When KP was captain (it really happened, google it) and the Indian tour got disrupted by the Mumbai Terror attacks. It was Strauss who showed the courage and conviction of a leader. He stated publicly that England should go back to India, and eventually the team agreed with him. It was the right decision.

In Chennai Strauss was a man on a mission, scoring hundreds in both innings. That’s some batting, and to top it off, it was in a losing cause. He’d dragged his team to India, then he’d put them on his back, and it wasn’t even his team yet.

Then it was, and Strauss turned a team of decent players into a professional unit that beat teams up with precision and tedium. They, briefly, took over the world. There is no doubt that without Strauss this team would have continued to be an inconsistent spoiler team.

That’s not to say Strauss was perfect. At several times during his career he was short of runs, his captaincy was slightly more conservative than his friend David Cameron’s front bench, and there were times it felt like he was Andy Flower’s puppet (which is not how he got his nickname muppet).

But for a Late blooming Test player to play 100 Tests, 50 as captain, win three Ashes (two in charge), beat the number one team 4-0 and claim the number one title all with a batting average of barely 40. There is something special to that. It’s an overachievement on a massive scale. Strauss found a way to drag the absolute best out of himself. And then he used the lessons he‘d learnt about professionalism on his own and made a whole team better.

In doing all Strauss went from a fairly forgettable opening batsman to a captain who’ll be mentioned for years to come. Strauss only touched greatness a couple of times, but who expected him to even touch it once? Especially with an average of 40.91.

Strauss was definitely much more than a forgettable opener with a few decent shots through point. I’m just glad we got to see it.

Advertisements
Tagged ,

One thought on “Strauss the overachiever

  1. Jack says:

    I think it is fair to say that one of the main reasons Strauss got brought back for that New Zealand tour was because England’s slip cordon had been that bad the selectors wanted someone in there who was reliable.

    They had lost Tres and Flintoff was inured a lot, and at the time Eng were spilling catches left, right and centre. At the time I remember being of the opinion that that was one of the main reasons why he got the nod over Ravi. I think Ravi had just failed in Sri Lanka, but the selectors were all for giving players a chance back then and Ravi got dumped quite quickly for Strauss.

Comments are closed.