This is not Steve Smith’s era

Steve Smith is barely 23 years old and he’s already a relic of another era.

Smith is the last of Andrew Hilditch’s big Ashes gambles. Some may argue that Andrew Hilditch’s reign became untenable years before he disappeared. But there he was in 10/11, seemingly sharing his position of Chairman of selectors with the National Talent Manager Greg Chappell. Between them they came up with three young players to save Australia.

Phil Hughes had barely made a run for the summer in shield cricket and was oddly brought back at the WACA to face Chris Tremlett and Steven Finn after being dropped because it was assumed he had a problem with the short ball. Usman Khawaja was brought in to bat at number three for his first Test, (Bradman batted at seven in his first Test, Ponting at five) against an attack that had routinely shredded Australia’s batsmen.

And Steve Smith was brought in for the Perth Test to bat at number six after Marcus North’s career was ended. Five months earlier Ricky Ponting was asked directly if Steve Smith was a number six batsman, he said no. But there was Steve Smith, walking out to bat at number six for his country with a slightly dodgy technique on a wicket that allows few errors.

The Test at which Ponting was asked about Smith at six was on Smith’s greatest international moment. Playing as a bowling allrounder and batting at eight, Smith had been part of the carnage at Headingley when Pakistan had bowled them for 88. In the second innings he came in with Australia 6/217 and a lead of only 48. Smith spent quite a while just staying in with Tim Paine and then Mitchell Johnson. It was a very patient innings from someone who rarely shows that trait.

When Smith was left with the tail, he exploded. Multiple boundaries of Asif, Gul and Amir showed his talent, and back to back sixes off Danish Kaneria showed how much he believed in himself. Three of these bowlers are now in disgrace, but in this match Asif and Amir were in another zone, and Kaneria was hit for more boundaries by Smith in that innings than the rest of the Australians had hit off him in the entire match. By the time Smith went out for 77, Australia had a lead of 180 and had a chance of stealing a match they shouldn’t have been close to. Yet, in that match, and in every Test he has played since, he’s gone wicketless.

The reason Smith was there in the first place wasn’t just a Hilditch hunch. Smith’s first full season of first class cricket he averaged 77 with the bat, making four hundreds. And finished the year with a 7/64 haul against South Australia. He was only 20. Clearly already one of the best fieldsmen on the planet. A breath of fresh air in a stale team. And Australia took that gamble.

It hasn’t paid off.

Three years down the track Smith is still not a number six international batsman. In five Tests he has two half centuries and an average of 28. In 31 ODIs he has no half centuries and an average of 21. In 20 T20s he has no half centuries an average of 15 and a strikerate of 108.

As a bowler in Tests he only has the three wickets from his first Test, as Marcus North took six wickets at the other end. In ODIs Smith averages 34 with the ball, but Michael Clarke didn’t even give him a bowl in his last match. Smith has only ever bowled out his 10 overs twice. In his last five ODIs he’s only bowled 8 overs, and three times hasn’t bowed at all. It’s in T20s his bowling has been most effective. An average of 21 and econ of 7.85. But he’s only bowled in two of his last six games. Which isn’t a good sign.

Smith is now an extremely experienced young cricketer. He’s played for Australia, New South Wales, Pune Warriors, Worcestershire, Kochi Tuskers, Royal Challengers Bangalore and even for Kent 2nd XI. Yet, he doesn’t seem to be improving at all. Being an energetic guy and a brilliant fielder only gets you so far.

Years ago I remember the late great David Hookes on commentary when Derek Crookes was being talked about as a great fielder. They flashed up his stats as they talked about him, and Hookes (thinking he was off mic) said something roughly like “with stats like that, he’d wanna be a {expletive deleted} good fielder”.

John Inverarity has already cut Hughes and Khawaja loose, hoping that they will perform and demand reselection. Now the same has to be done with Smith. Smith is a brilliant fielder, a flawed batsman and a rarely used bowler. In this era, Australia need more.

Advertisements
Tagged ,

3 thoughts on “This is not Steve Smith’s era

  1. Nick says:

    the advent of 2 new balls per innings could spell the end of Smith and other bits and peices cricketers of his ilk

  2. Micky_Jay says:

    I am a firm believer of Smith’s potential to be a more than handy Test all rounder (but I did think the same of White).

    However, I don’t think that he is the limited overs star that he is perceived to be. He doesn’t have the knack of putting the ball where he wants to like Mike Hussey, so the accumulator, comtroller of an innings is not his go. He doesn’t possess the raw power to brutalise the ball to all parts at whim like a Dave Warner. Having Smith come in at 6, 7 or even 8 is more likely to end up with a 15 ball 15 runs type innings.

    His bowling is as exciting as a 23 yo legspiner can be. He shows enough talent for you to think “this kid could be good in 5-6 years time if he keeps at it” . He certainly isn’t the bees knees or the ducks nuts quite yet, Clarke obviously agrees or Smith would get a bowl.

    The best thing for him would be to be dropped and not play cricket for Australia for 3 years. Lem him score a couple of thousand runs for NSW, take more than 20-30 wickets, and let him learn his game. He would come back into the top squad as a seasoned cricketer and would be able to prove his worth..

    …unless he doesn’t and ends up a serviceable state cricketer with and Australain training shirt in his kit to remind him of what nearly was.

  3. Kunal K says:

    From the Mirror

    “What is the problem with getting out with two needed anyway you may ask.

    It is not the actual numbers that is the problem it is what it represents and what it says about the player that is the issue here.

    Both men are supremely talented batsmen, of that there is no question, but between the ears they have had more problems than Jay-Z and the pitch ain’t one.”

Comments are closed.