Comments on: Broad starts his defence

By: Siddimaula

Siddimaula — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:24:19 +0000

Gah this jogesh99 is such a drag. “Whitey”? THE RAJ? Really dude? Maybe with the hordes of Indian cricket fans descending upon various internet fora, the hitler complex will be displaced by whatever-it-is-you’re-implying. As an Indian fan, I limit my discourse to Sachin-worship and Sehwag-adulation (yea pantheism!). Maybe you should too.

Broad will never be booked. Gadzooks, the man looks five years old

By: jogesh99

jogesh99 — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:09:42 +0000

LL – now thats downright nasty!

Alex – LL is a crypto-chokedulkarphile, he once had SRT tattooed on his arse.

Timothy – yeah, and they both ball tamper and then play holier than thou.
I wonder who Broad plans to sue?

By: Timothy

Timothy — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 10:03:46 +0000

Anyone notice how Broad’s batting has turned shithouse after he started becoming a real bowler – Beware, The Search For The Next Botham snarls and licks its chops, looking for a new doll to chew up.

By: Johnny Twoshoes

Johnny Twoshoes — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 06:55:22 +0000

I do apologise. I was reading elsewhere and the ridiculousness of the comments had started to annoy me, I should have kept my comments to the right blog. I’m also new to this lark and didn’t realise that anyone would take me the slightest bit seriously. I also agree that I committed the sin of being less relevant than I should have.
Head in hung in shame – it won’t happen again.
I’ve been finding this stuff really boring and I now get that’s why I should have kept my mouth shut as I only made it worse.

This blogging/social networking thing really does work like a day care center, doesn’t it?

By: LL

LL — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 06:09:38 +0000

Hey Alex did you know that Jogesh99 is Sachin’s number 1 fan?

By: jogesh99

jogesh99 — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:30:49 +0000

As long as you learnt something – though i doubt it.

By: SarahCanterbury

SarahCanterbury — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:33:43 +0000

I rather resent the implication that I’m automatically a racist and can’t be objective because a) Broad amuses me and b) I’m white. Strikes me if white people said half the things others do, we’d be slated appallingly but others seem to think they can make these inflammatory comments & it’s acceptable precisely because they are not white. Racism isn’t just one way, you know. Or maybe I’ve just missed the point of the argument on here?

Agree, Lisa – probably best to stop commenting on this particular thread now.
.-= SarahCanterbury´s last blog ..Paul Collingwood =-.

By: Lisa

Lisa — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:31:26 +0000

Oh for fuck’s sake. I can’t be bothered.

This site used to be fun.

By: jogesh99

jogesh99 — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:53:07 +0000

Whitey defence demystified:
Point 1.1: Deny Intent.
So Broad stepped on the ball and it was tampered, but it wasn’t intentional – he was just tired.
So Haddin waves his bat at Benn, but it wasnt intended to be threatening.
So Watson and McGrath always get in the way of batsmen running, but it isnt intended to block them.
So Ponting throws the ball at Jayasuriya who hasnt left his crease, and hits him, but it was intended for the keeper.

By: jogesh99

jogesh99 — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:20:01 +0000

Papa Broad’s patriarchy – so glad someone noticed :) .
In fact the languages of orientalism and racism are entirely patriarchal – applied to the categories of race, society and civilisation of course.

White woman v/s brown caste hindu male – its a tough call which one of us has the higher moral ground.

Re Gavaskar – he always has an hidden agenda, so maybe youre right, its very possible Baby Broad gets let off simply because he’s white, and not because of his pappy.

Reverse swing a Dark Art, like witch doctors and vooo-dooo and tom-toms – you dont say! These demmd natives really are the schemingest little devils. Like that darkie Ranji, he had the audacity to cross his legs and tickle the ball to fine leg I say. Should have stemmed the rot right there – but those dashed liberals at the MCC – allowing the chappie to represent England in the Ashes. And before you know it they’ve got rubber wristed niggers bowling wrong-un offies – whats that you say – the ddhoos-rah, I see, the chaps have a name for it too, sounds like the last orgasmic gasp of a ravaged Maharani if you ask me, … .

Absolutely Lisa, no racism there at all, just the whitey rational analytical mind at its best.
Demystification – oh boy!