Comments on: Nathan to Brendan http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/12/05/nathan-to-brendan/ just another bullshit cricket blog Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:12:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Leg Break http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/12/05/nathan-to-brendan/comment-page-1/#comment-19494 Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:18:42 +0000 http://www.cricketwithballs.com/2009/12/05/nathan-to-brendan/#comment-19494 I thought this was going to be about the McCullum family.

]]> By: Winsome http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/12/05/nathan-to-brendan/comment-page-1/#comment-19493 Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:02:31 +0000 http://www.cricketwithballs.com/2009/12/05/nathan-to-brendan/#comment-19493 I must have missed them, or were they those beige pixilated patches where a batsman and bowler should be?

]]> By: Dustbinner http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/12/05/nathan-to-brendan/comment-page-1/#comment-19492 Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:26:44 +0000 http://www.cricketwithballs.com/2009/12/05/nathan-to-brendan/#comment-19492 I see you’re picking on my blessed Nathan, again :-(

You know, I only found out the other that he’s a good catholic private school boy. He looks it, though, doesn’t he?
.-= Dustbinner´s last blog ..Ricky loves Shivnarine =-.

]]> By: poopsie http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/12/05/nathan-to-brendan/comment-page-1/#comment-19491 Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:35:42 +0000 http://www.cricketwithballs.com/2009/12/05/nathan-to-brendan/#comment-19491 I always wonder whether they would get picked for their respective state teams now. Hauritz maybe, although he still has not taken a bag of wickets in an innings, and Nash maybe out of sympathy, but they could just as easily be passed over

]]>