This is the crux of it. The third umpire is not making the decision even though he has all the technology and is the one looking at it. It really is a half-assed way of doing it. If a decision gets referred, then the third umpire should make the bloody decision.

That was the problem in the West Indies. They got decisions actually completely wrong on review as they were upholding the wrong original decision or in one memorable occasion, the third umpire overturned the correct decision..

Shit, it was funny.

The West Indies lower order are certainly giving it some thrash this morning.

People losing chances because they asked to review lbw and found no ball should not make team lose their two chances.

That is wrong.

We do not have 3D camera , it can only show few angles. It is better than nothing.

if team challenging a decision on LBW and it he overstepped which has not been challenged the team should not lose challenge.

It is not up to the teams . It is clearly bad Rule.

Also i am vehemently disgaree with all the people who disagree with Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS) , simply because with this atleast Team has a choice. May be two choices better than nothing and depends on umpire to have correct decision all the time is sticking with old mismanagement.

we want steve bucknors( acts like he is a aristocrat , may be hair had an influence on him ) to decide on the fate of the game is bad bad and acception low quality.

We need to constantly improve on the umpiring. You will never have perfect software or perfect decision all the time.

We can only give choices for teams to minimize the mistakes. People say these review system takes valuable time in middle of the game. I say baloney. Teams waste time in so many ways.

I still can’t fathom why people disagree with Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS)