sehwag in a wool cap

I have just finished watching Sehwag make his hundred, via highlights.

Editors have not yet worked out that for Sehwag highlights are not required, he is highlights.

Every ball he faces should be shown.

But overlooking poor judgement from editors, what a knock.

Poor Mendis was fucked so hard he was left bleeding from his ear.

Murali was dismissed as a club bowler.

And Herath’s magical new ball was hoicked without a care in the world.

The best thing about the innings had to be Sehwag batting in a proper woolen cap.

What a sight that was.

I think I sighed.

Watching him swing the ball to all parts is always a religious experience, but with the cap on it took it to a new level.

I thought Dilshan, is padawan learner, was cool with the flowing locks going wild in the wind when facing the spinners, but Sehwag just trumped him.

Yesterday he showed the world why they should be sehwagologists.

That is why he gets a mention in things he shouldn’t.

From next year on I shall done a blue cap in honour of this majestical mystical icon.

Advertisement
Tagged , ,

0 thoughts on “sehwag in a wool cap

  1. Steam Wah says:

    From a bean bag to a beanie head.. he is into Kallisthenics!
    .-= Steam Wah´s last blog ..B.B.O.T.D. – The line up =-.

  2. jogesh99 says:

    I’m so glad you put Trumper in your Sehwag XI.
    Trumper on playing spin: “If you get to the pitch of the ball, it doesnt matter which way it breaks.”
    Sehwag, the true inheritor of Trumper’s legacy.

  3. alex says:

    Sehwagoly rules!.

  4. bikram pratap singh says:

    one might be a great writer but he should not write like this (Sachin “Please, may I have a hundred, Kumar” Tendulkar) its rediculous and i want to abuse that writer “Bastard”. if dravid not getting correct table, what sachin can do?

  5. Much as I admire the batting of Sehwag, Gambhir and Dravid, i kind of think this is a conspiracy by the Indian cricket board to provide the dullest flattest pitches and therefore kill off test cricket in the sub-continent.

    Someone from the ICC should be having a word…

    The In Dipper

  6. Prabu says:

    Shameless plug! Smooth….but shameless…

  7. zerosummer says:

    what’s the “mention”? can you quote?

    • jrod says:

      ZS, “I must confess a deep and dark secret; I am not one of those people who believe the Ashes are cricket. I want to believe it, I honestly do. But when I see a Sehwag slash through point, a Mushtaq wrong’un, or a Stephen Fleming trap at point I know that cricket is more important than the Ashes.”

  8. Sach says:

    Though ridiculously outrageous it was, not the best. Fucken useless pitches, even Shane Watson could score a 100 on these pitches. Oh wait, he already did?
    .-= Sach´s last blog ..Going Underground =-.

  9. raj says:

    Jrod – this comment is not directly addressed at you – a general rant
    Where are the “India is creating dead pitches and killing test cricket” blokes now? :-)
    Jumped the gun, didnt you?

    So, should I conclude that the current crop of Indian bowlers are so great that they extracted life out of a dead pitch? Or, more sensibly, that bloggers and commenters waiting for any chance to demean BCCI and India had just jumped the gun?

    A few years back, Australia started scoring 360+ on the first day – it was hailed as a new age, a new era, a revolutionary change to Cricket. India does that – and it is either match fixing or pitch fixing? Where are your faces now – now that SL’s goose has been cooked well and truly on a dead pitch? This is lose-lose for you guys isnt it? You either maintain that it is a dead pitch and end up giving the indian bowlers undue credit or you admit that you were wrong about the pitch. I am enjoying it.

  10. raj says:

    Same thoughts better articulated here:
    http://tcwj.blogspot.com/2009/11/thanks-sree-and-good-fer-ya.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tcwj+%28The+Cricket+Watcher%27s+Journal%29

    A most pertinent comment from there:

    Golandaaz said… :
    You are so true about the pent up emotions against india. I can’t fathom what it is. I do not remember a time when I dismissed top class performances by the English or the Aussies simply because their boards were more powerful and more eviler than ours

    • jrod says:

      Raj, I write about how great Dravid is, and Indians call me a bastard and a cheat because I am an Aussie. I think Indians do ok in the pent up aggression stakes.

  11. alex says:

    Jrod , i don’t call you anything. Infact we want 100′s of jrods to tell the truth like it is in a funny way.

    you can’t expect sane response from sachin fans. They think sachin is god this and that. They are not indians. They are in a sachin cult.

    Ignore them.

    That said there is still an emotion in aussies/english in that bcci running cricket is not right for them. So they find issues with everything.

    i don’t mind blaming BCCI for right reasons.

    EVery country make pitches that suit their bowlers to get 20 wickets. India never had fast bowlers that can rattle opposition. They can get max 2-3 wickets. so only dustbowls they can surely win the matches with their spinners and flat wickets to keep the game for 5 days.

    Srilanka makes spinning wicket , AUS makes bouncy wickets , SA , ENG make seaming wickets.

    India is good for batting , so flat wickets. For me it do not matter what wicket is as long as there is a result or close to it.

    Srilanak got crushed because of two things. 642 runs was long way and lost patience and also thought sreesanth was not good bowler. Sreesanth still got skills , he need to channelise it. Srilanka did not use brain and did not tire out bowlers and attack later.

    The whole game would have been different if Jayawardene caught the sehwag. You never drop a catch of GOD or he will punish you.

    • jrod says:

      Alex, cheers. But it isn’t just India pitches people are complaining about. West Indian and English pitches are dreadful for bowling on, so many places around the world seem to have pitches that no one can get wickets on, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and New Zealand have all had them in the last few years, the Waca is another one. They are popping up everywhere.

  12. raj says:

    Jrod, You,sir, ae consistently speaking up about pitches everywhere but I’m sure you will be the fist to admit that that is not the case with many english/ozzie blogger/newspaperman/former cricketer. There is an equal amount of pent up aggrression against bcci. Not many indians ae fans of bcci but we protest because we see hypocritical ranting against bcci – I am fairly convinced many of these ranters will care a damn if ecb or acb ran cricket and did the same things.

    If you see a lot more indians, that is prolly because there are a lot of us indians around in this world :-)

  13. @jrod @raj @alex the pitches are getting fuckall because it seems the brief to the groundsmen these days is “make a 5 day pitch”. Now the groundsmen cannot rely on the defensive skills of today’s batters. So they make a fuckall pitch taken straight out of the airport runways.
    Exception being cases where the home team is losing. eg: the Kanpur pitch against South Africa. The Inidians were trailing 1-0 and the Saffers historically do not play spin well. So we got the pitch which reminded us all of the terror tracks of the mid 90s.
    Another example was the pitch prepared in Barbados in 2002. India won at Port of Spain. The next match was a virtual massacre.
    .-= Dhananjay Mhatre´s last blog ..Dhaanu: Random trivia – Under Dravid India won overseas victories in England and West Indies after loong time. And he was a poor captain? #cricket =-.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,461 other followers