<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: three from me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/</link>
	<description>just another bullshit cricket blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: prakash duraisamy</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prakash duraisamy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Viru&#039;s opinion on Dravid
Virender Sehwag on why he thinks Rahul Dravid is the perfect cricketer


To me Rahul Dravid is the perfect cricketer. By the time I decided I would take cricket seriously and make it my profession, Rahul was already doing wonders with his bat. While I always wanted to be like Sachin Tendulkar, there have been plenty of things I have learned from Rahul.

His technique and temperament always fascinated me and now it is clear that his success abroad is because of those two factors. His technique is so good that he can be at ease on any sort of wicket and in any sort of conditions. His temperament and discipline allow him to adapt to different situations without discomfort.

But it was only when I met him that I realised he is a special player because of more than just these two qualities. I read somewhere that attitudes are contagious; if that&#039;s true, his is definitely worth catching. Everything about him is so solid - his character, his technique, everything. He is precise about his practice, and even in his speech he is to the point. There is nothing wasteful about him. Any kind of match is a battle to be won for him. You won&#039;t find any difference in his level of commitment, whether it&#039;s a domestic game, a Test match or even a practice game.

I still remember my debut at Mohali. Rahul tried his best to make me comfortable in the dressing room. For a youngster these things make a lot of difference. When you are out of form, he is the best person to go to. His knowledge, about cricket and about things outside it, means that he can answer all sorts of questions, address all kinds of insecurities you can have at this level of cricket. For younger players, he is a psychological guru and motivator.

Last year in Mohali when he was captaining the side, he told me: whenever you go out to bat, think that this is your day. When I got out after making 195 at Melbourne, Rahul said I wouldn&#039;t realise then what I&#039;d done on that day but would understand the worth and the implications of what I had done only later, and that sooner or later I would come to terms with it. It didn&#039;t take very long for me to realise that if I had stayed at the crease a bit longer we could have made history. I think those two things really helped me plan my innings in Pakistan.

Rahul understands people so well that when he talks to you it&#039;s in a language you understand; he communicates not only with you but with your personality in a way. To me, he always gives small goals. He says, &#039;Veeru, you stay here for an hour and the scoreboard will be full of runs.&#039; When I play a rash shot he comes and says, &#039;Yaar why are you in a hurry to go to the dressing room? What will you do there? You&#039;ll have to sit and watch others and think, O Shit, I&#039;ve lost a golden opportunity to get a big one.&#039; Things like that immediately bring your focus back. Batting with him makes things simple. Like in a Test match when you see him bat and he&#039;s looking rock solid, you start to think, &#039;These guys can&#039;t even beat his bat; the bowling&#039;s not that great.&#039;

He is the pillar of our team and the batting revolves around him. Whenever we have done well as a batting unit, whether in Tests or one-dayers, it&#039;s largely due to Rahul. Front foot or back, spin or pace, he has all the shots. But it&#039;s his judgment about what shot to execute and when that makes him special.

Whenever he gets out, the first thing we think is that we have lost almost fifty overs worth of batting. You know he puts a price tag on his wicket. Whenever he does lose it cheaply, he gets really upset. Everyone gets sad after losing his wicket, but after a while we forget and think ahead. But with Rahul he will think about it, work it out in the nets and make sure that it doesn&#039;t happen again. You won&#039;t see him get out in the same way very often. It just shows that he is quick to learn from his mistakes. There is a lot of passion in his performance. He got so emotional after winning the Adelaide Test last year  he didn&#039;t want to take off his whites, and I remember he wore them to the bar that night also.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viru&#8217;s opinion on Dravid<br />
Virender Sehwag on why he thinks Rahul Dravid is the perfect cricketer</p>
<p>To me Rahul Dravid is the perfect cricketer. By the time I decided I would take cricket seriously and make it my profession, Rahul was already doing wonders with his bat. While I always wanted to be like Sachin Tendulkar, there have been plenty of things I have learned from Rahul.</p>
<p>His technique and temperament always fascinated me and now it is clear that his success abroad is because of those two factors. His technique is so good that he can be at ease on any sort of wicket and in any sort of conditions. His temperament and discipline allow him to adapt to different situations without discomfort.</p>
<p>But it was only when I met him that I realised he is a special player because of more than just these two qualities. I read somewhere that attitudes are contagious; if that&#8217;s true, his is definitely worth catching. Everything about him is so solid &#8211; his character, his technique, everything. He is precise about his practice, and even in his speech he is to the point. There is nothing wasteful about him. Any kind of match is a battle to be won for him. You won&#8217;t find any difference in his level of commitment, whether it&#8217;s a domestic game, a Test match or even a practice game.</p>
<p>I still remember my debut at Mohali. Rahul tried his best to make me comfortable in the dressing room. For a youngster these things make a lot of difference. When you are out of form, he is the best person to go to. His knowledge, about cricket and about things outside it, means that he can answer all sorts of questions, address all kinds of insecurities you can have at this level of cricket. For younger players, he is a psychological guru and motivator.</p>
<p>Last year in Mohali when he was captaining the side, he told me: whenever you go out to bat, think that this is your day. When I got out after making 195 at Melbourne, Rahul said I wouldn&#8217;t realise then what I&#8217;d done on that day but would understand the worth and the implications of what I had done only later, and that sooner or later I would come to terms with it. It didn&#8217;t take very long for me to realise that if I had stayed at the crease a bit longer we could have made history. I think those two things really helped me plan my innings in Pakistan.</p>
<p>Rahul understands people so well that when he talks to you it&#8217;s in a language you understand; he communicates not only with you but with your personality in a way. To me, he always gives small goals. He says, &#8216;Veeru, you stay here for an hour and the scoreboard will be full of runs.&#8217; When I play a rash shot he comes and says, &#8216;Yaar why are you in a hurry to go to the dressing room? What will you do there? You&#8217;ll have to sit and watch others and think, O Shit, I&#8217;ve lost a golden opportunity to get a big one.&#8217; Things like that immediately bring your focus back. Batting with him makes things simple. Like in a Test match when you see him bat and he&#8217;s looking rock solid, you start to think, &#8216;These guys can&#8217;t even beat his bat; the bowling&#8217;s not that great.&#8217;</p>
<p>He is the pillar of our team and the batting revolves around him. Whenever we have done well as a batting unit, whether in Tests or one-dayers, it&#8217;s largely due to Rahul. Front foot or back, spin or pace, he has all the shots. But it&#8217;s his judgment about what shot to execute and when that makes him special.</p>
<p>Whenever he gets out, the first thing we think is that we have lost almost fifty overs worth of batting. You know he puts a price tag on his wicket. Whenever he does lose it cheaply, he gets really upset. Everyone gets sad after losing his wicket, but after a while we forget and think ahead. But with Rahul he will think about it, work it out in the nets and make sure that it doesn&#8217;t happen again. You won&#8217;t see him get out in the same way very often. It just shows that he is quick to learn from his mistakes. There is a lot of passion in his performance. He got so emotional after winning the Adelaide Test last year  he didn&#8217;t want to take off his whites, and I remember he wore them to the bar that night also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yogi bear</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yogi bear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tendulkar asks for his hundreds. thats true, isnt it? he always does. and he gets it. it is only the double hundreds that he doesnt get. he once asked dravid for a double hundred in pakistan in 2004 and dravid refused. tendulkar cried and sulked and complained to the media and has been sulking ever since :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tendulkar asks for his hundreds. thats true, isnt it? he always does. and he gets it. it is only the double hundreds that he doesnt get. he once asked dravid for a double hundred in pakistan in 2004 and dravid refused. tendulkar cried and sulked and complained to the media and has been sulking ever since :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghurram</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ghurram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it even really worth an argument ? Both are great players .. period.

Now catch on on howzat ! seeya !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it even really worth an argument ? Both are great players .. period.</p>
<p>Now catch on on howzat ! seeya !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butjazz</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[butjazz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost every cricket fan agrees to the fact that Rahul Dravid is not appreciated enough and then go on to laud him and remember all his great innings and contributions and how he is actually better than Tendulkar or Laxman or Sehwag. Isnt it OXYMORONICAL?
.-= butjazz´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://cricketquiz.butjazz.com/2009/11/sachin-tendulkar-quiz-trivia/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Sachin Tendulkar Quiz&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost every cricket fan agrees to the fact that Rahul Dravid is not appreciated enough and then go on to laud him and remember all his great innings and contributions and how he is actually better than Tendulkar or Laxman or Sehwag. Isnt it OXYMORONICAL?<br />
.-= butjazz´s last blog ..<a href="http://cricketquiz.butjazz.com/2009/11/sachin-tendulkar-quiz-trivia/" rel="nofollow">The Sachin Tendulkar Quiz</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrod</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice try, relax, take some deep breaths. It was a simple error, it meant to say Dravid makes more runs per test than Sachin does, I have informed cricinfo of this momentous error, they assured me they will correct it. Dravid makes 82 runs per test, Sachin makes 80 runs per test. This article was about Dravid, not Sachin, is it ok to talk up an Indian champion and not talk up Sachin, just the once. My heroes are also Indian, does that mean they are cheats as well? Or are they prone to the odd mistake, like I am?

Dinkar, I have already covered this in the comments, I don&#039;t think Sachin did anything wrong, but i thought it was funny he asked for a hundred. Funny wins. 

Sunny, not on all of them, thank fuck. 

Poopsie, thanks. 

JV, sorry mate, i said runs per innings to you as well, i must have runs per innings on the brain, i never even checked runs per innings, someone told me Dravid makes more runs per test, so I looked that up, and he does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try, relax, take some deep breaths. It was a simple error, it meant to say Dravid makes more runs per test than Sachin does, I have informed cricinfo of this momentous error, they assured me they will correct it. Dravid makes 82 runs per test, Sachin makes 80 runs per test. This article was about Dravid, not Sachin, is it ok to talk up an Indian champion and not talk up Sachin, just the once. My heroes are also Indian, does that mean they are cheats as well? Or are they prone to the odd mistake, like I am?</p>
<p>Dinkar, I have already covered this in the comments, I don&#8217;t think Sachin did anything wrong, but i thought it was funny he asked for a hundred. Funny wins. </p>
<p>Sunny, not on all of them, thank fuck. </p>
<p>Poopsie, thanks. </p>
<p>JV, sorry mate, i said runs per innings to you as well, i must have runs per innings on the brain, i never even checked runs per innings, someone told me Dravid makes more runs per test, so I looked that up, and he does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jrod : Tendulkar is 2 runs ahead of Dravid in runs per innings]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jrod : Tendulkar is 2 runs ahead of Dravid in runs per innings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prakash duraisamy</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prakash duraisamy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(This is the answer for your critics on Rahul Dravid)Negative People will Always Criticize ; SOURCE -YOU CAN WIN BOOK)
Some people criticize no matter what. It does not matter which side you are on, they are
always on the other side. They have made a career out of criticizing. They are &quot;career
critics.&quot; They criticize as if they will win a prize at a contest. They will find fault with every
person and every situation. You will find people like this in every home, family, office.
They go around finding fault and telling everybody how bad things are and blaming the
whole world for their problems. We have a name for these people. They are called
energy suckers. They will go to the cafeteria and drown themselves in 20 cups of tea and
coffee and smoke to their hearts&#039; content with one excuse: they are trying to relax. All
that they are doing is causing more tension for themselves and for others around them.
They spread negative messages like a plague and create an environment conducive to
negative results.
Robert Fulton invented the steamboat. On the banks of the Hudson River he was
displaying his new invention. The pessimists and the skeptics were gathered around to
observe. They commented that it would never start. Lo and behold, it did. As it made its
way down the river, the pessimists who said it would never go, started shouting that it
would never stop. What an attitude!
SOME PEOPLE ALWAYS LOOK FOR THE NEGATIVE
There was a hunter who bought a bird dog, the only one of its kind in the world. That
could walk on water . He couldn&#039;t believe his eyes when he saw this miracle. At the
same time, he was very pleased that he could show off his new acquisition to his friends.
He invited a friend to go duck hunting. After some time, they shot a few ducks and the
man ordered his dog to run and fetch the birds. All day-long, the dog ran on water and
kept fetching the birds. The owner was expecting a comment or a compliment about his
amazing dog, but never got one. As they were returning home, he asked his friend if he had noticed anything unusual about his dog. The friend replied, &quot;Yes, in fact, I did notice
something unusual. Your dog can&#039;t swim.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(This is the answer for your critics on Rahul Dravid)Negative People will Always Criticize ; SOURCE -YOU CAN WIN BOOK)<br />
Some people criticize no matter what. It does not matter which side you are on, they are<br />
always on the other side. They have made a career out of criticizing. They are &#8220;career<br />
critics.&#8221; They criticize as if they will win a prize at a contest. They will find fault with every<br />
person and every situation. You will find people like this in every home, family, office.<br />
They go around finding fault and telling everybody how bad things are and blaming the<br />
whole world for their problems. We have a name for these people. They are called<br />
energy suckers. They will go to the cafeteria and drown themselves in 20 cups of tea and<br />
coffee and smoke to their hearts&#8217; content with one excuse: they are trying to relax. All<br />
that they are doing is causing more tension for themselves and for others around them.<br />
They spread negative messages like a plague and create an environment conducive to<br />
negative results.<br />
Robert Fulton invented the steamboat. On the banks of the Hudson River he was<br />
displaying his new invention. The pessimists and the skeptics were gathered around to<br />
observe. They commented that it would never start. Lo and behold, it did. As it made its<br />
way down the river, the pessimists who said it would never go, started shouting that it<br />
would never stop. What an attitude!<br />
SOME PEOPLE ALWAYS LOOK FOR THE NEGATIVE<br />
There was a hunter who bought a bird dog, the only one of its kind in the world. That<br />
could walk on water . He couldn&#8217;t believe his eyes when he saw this miracle. At the<br />
same time, he was very pleased that he could show off his new acquisition to his friends.<br />
He invited a friend to go duck hunting. After some time, they shot a few ducks and the<br />
man ordered his dog to run and fetch the birds. All day-long, the dog ran on water and<br />
kept fetching the birds. The owner was expecting a comment or a compliment about his<br />
amazing dog, but never got one. As they were returning home, he asked his friend if he had noticed anything unusual about his dog. The friend replied, &#8220;Yes, in fact, I did notice<br />
something unusual. Your dog can&#8217;t swim.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhananjay Mhatre</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dhananjay Mhatre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@alex - Great find. Though wristy Jayawardhane is anything but a probot. Btw someone should label the WI - Australia series as the battle of the two probots (Hussey Vs. Chanderpaul).

Dravid is something else. Good to see people get emotional about him even though they did not get the satire.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alex &#8211; Great find. Though wristy Jayawardhane is anything but a probot. Btw someone should label the WI &#8211; Australia series as the battle of the two probots (Hussey Vs. Chanderpaul).</p>
<p>Dravid is something else. Good to see people get emotional about him even though they did not get the satire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rakesh do not understand the humor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rakesh do not understand the humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/24/three-from-me/comment-page-1/#comment-19134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7308#comment-19134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow!! I am happy to see so many ppl praising Dravid.All these I was only one chanting his name.Because this hope less media in India , ppl dont look beyond sachin.Just like India failed in exposing all its icons, BCCI has failed in recognizing its cricketing icons.

When ever India fails,its on that day that everyone realizes the importance of Mr.Dependable.The Great Wall of Indian Cricket ??? Sorry he is not just the wall.He is a  juggernaut even in the situation of crisis. Poor Dhoni , looks like he is running out of his luck in ODIs.I believe he has his luck as long as the Mr.dependable is in the Test squad.

He has always been the savior  of our team.I still realise what made the sports ministry feel that Dhoni deserved Khel Ratna more than the cricketing GREAT Dravid]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!! I am happy to see so many ppl praising Dravid.All these I was only one chanting his name.Because this hope less media in India , ppl dont look beyond sachin.Just like India failed in exposing all its icons, BCCI has failed in recognizing its cricketing icons.</p>
<p>When ever India fails,its on that day that everyone realizes the importance of Mr.Dependable.The Great Wall of Indian Cricket ??? Sorry he is not just the wall.He is a  juggernaut even in the situation of crisis. Poor Dhoni , looks like he is running out of his luck in ODIs.I believe he has his luck as long as the Mr.dependable is in the Test squad.</p>
<p>He has always been the savior  of our team.I still realise what made the sports ministry feel that Dhoni deserved Khel Ratna more than the cricketing GREAT Dravid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

