<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Burt Cockley question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/</link>
	<description>just another bullshit cricket blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vim</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, I meant play themselves in, in terms of runrate being against them taking a look at the bowling before they started swinging. In those circumstances, a new bowler that no-one has seen is probably as useful as one they know better.

But SRT was superlative. Didn&#039;t help them in the end though.

Can I just say that I will be pleased if Burt Cockley doesn&#039;t get a game today? Not that I dislike him but I am fed up to the gills with this undervaluing of the baggy green. Literally, anyone can get a game just now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I meant play themselves in, in terms of runrate being against them taking a look at the bowling before they started swinging. In those circumstances, a new bowler that no-one has seen is probably as useful as one they know better.</p>
<p>But SRT was superlative. Didn&#8217;t help them in the end though.</p>
<p>Can I just say that I will be pleased if Burt Cockley doesn&#8217;t get a game today? Not that I dislike him but I am fed up to the gills with this undervaluing of the baggy green. Literally, anyone can get a game just now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The slow rise of Doug Bollinger &#171; SpunOut</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The slow rise of Doug Bollinger &#171; SpunOut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 8, 2009 by A P Webster    Australia&#8217;s well-documented injury problems in India have allowed one or two players the chance to break into the side. The man with possibly the most [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8, 2009 by A P Webster    Australia&#8217;s well-documented injury problems in India have allowed one or two players the chance to break into the side. The man with possibly the most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miriam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, re the jrod&#039;s physique, I like men with soft sides, who order extra chips for the table, so happily all is well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, re the jrod&#8217;s physique, I like men with soft sides, who order extra chips for the table, so happily all is well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by the way, Nannes has been struck down with the dreaded hamstring (so has Cosgrove).

 What is the flaw in the Oz fitness regime?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way, Nannes has been struck down with the dreaded hamstring (so has Cosgrove).</p>
<p> What is the flaw in the Oz fitness regime?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vim 

for what is worth, India, who boast that they have the 4 best (at least) batsmen in the world  were playing a side drawn out of a party hat. Three were out to a cowboy. 

Play themselves in? What have they been doing the past 4 matches?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vim </p>
<p>for what is worth, India, who boast that they have the 4 best (at least) batsmen in the world  were playing a side drawn out of a party hat. Three were out to a cowboy. </p>
<p>Play themselves in? What have they been doing the past 4 matches?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie64</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh yeah, the big Rhino..

Most certainly...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, the big Rhino..</p>
<p>Most certainly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm. Clark and Nannes are being overlooked, and all you can think about is whether Cockley, McKay, Laughlin and so on are from NSW?

Hewy, I&#039;d suspect a state association conspriacy before bringing the papers into it. NSWCA harp on about producing international players, while the others might care about winning some Shields to catch up. Perhaps the selectors have decided they can make everyone happy by removing players from the NSW team...

But come on, Cockley over Clark - NSW bias? Hauritz over Casson last year? Looks more like a club bias to me... Go the Randy-Petes!
.-= Jonathan´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://rising-of-the-sun.blogspot.com/2009/11/six-months-on.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Six months on&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Clark and Nannes are being overlooked, and all you can think about is whether Cockley, McKay, Laughlin and so on are from NSW?</p>
<p>Hewy, I&#8217;d suspect a state association conspriacy before bringing the papers into it. NSWCA harp on about producing international players, while the others might care about winning some Shields to catch up. Perhaps the selectors have decided they can make everyone happy by removing players from the NSW team&#8230;</p>
<p>But come on, Cockley over Clark &#8211; NSW bias? Hauritz over Casson last year? Looks more like a club bias to me&#8230; Go the Randy-Petes!<br />
.-= Jonathan´s last blog ..<a href="http://rising-of-the-sun.blogspot.com/2009/11/six-months-on.html" rel="nofollow">Six months on</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vim</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just remembered. There was some odd picks against the Saffers earlier this year. Remember Ben Laughlin? At least he had played more than 4 List A matches (I think).

And he did take a screamer of a catch in one of the matches in Safferland.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just remembered. There was some odd picks against the Saffers earlier this year. Remember Ben Laughlin? At least he had played more than 4 List A matches (I think).</p>
<p>And he did take a screamer of a catch in one of the matches in Safferland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vim</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9 of them. Raina did alright, didnt he? 

SRT was pretty much a shining light in the wasteland, but hell, going along at more than a run a ball every over is a massive ask and it is only that SRT is a cut above everyone else AND was in such superlative nick that they got close. None of the incoming batsmen had time to play themselves in at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9 of them. Raina did alright, didnt he? </p>
<p>SRT was pretty much a shining light in the wasteland, but hell, going along at more than a run a ball every over is a massive ask and it is only that SRT is a cut above everyone else AND was in such superlative nick that they got close. None of the incoming batsmen had time to play themselves in at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/11/04/the-burt-cockley-question/comment-page-1/#comment-18711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=7209#comment-18711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and Vim, 
 
as for drinks-carrying, that&#039;s what 10 of the 11 Indians should have been doing. 
How useless were they?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and Vim, </p>
<p>as for drinks-carrying, that&#8217;s what 10 of the 11 Indians should have been doing.<br />
How useless were they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

