Comments on: Comparing apples to fleshlight sex toys http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/07/02/comparing-apples-to-fleshlight-sex-toys/ just another bullshit cricket blog Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:12:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Mr Popodopolous http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/07/02/comparing-apples-to-fleshlight-sex-toys/comment-page-1/#comment-15976 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:46:33 +0000 http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=5651#comment-15976 Well, er, England Lions still in though Lee terrific bowling. Whereas Warwickshire were all out inside 45 overs. Then again, England Lions > Warwickshire undoubtedly.

Then again, hindsight is at times a wonderful thing. :)

]]> By: Ian http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/07/02/comparing-apples-to-fleshlight-sex-toys/comment-page-1/#comment-15975 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:36:09 +0000 http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=5651#comment-15975 On today’s evidence, you could say that Panesar is better than the entire Aussie attack…

As long as it reminds a few of them how to play, after the fun and frolicks of the Twenty20, then they have a minor meaning. Roll on next Wednesday for the real constest.

]]> By: marxkernow http://cricketwithballs.com/2009/07/02/comparing-apples-to-fleshlight-sex-toys/comment-page-1/#comment-15974 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:38:18 +0000 http://www.cricketwithballs.com/?p=5651#comment-15974 Does mine in also…is there really such a thing as meaningless cricket?

]]>