…
A very intelligent cricket blogger once wrote
If he averages under 70, England will win, if not, good luck England.
Before that he wrote
So far the King has made a 90 and just finished up with a nice little 1fiddy2 to put on the mantelpiece. And at stumps it looks like he may have won or drawn a game for the boys.
Not even a swarm of killer bees could stop him.
You have to feel sorry for the English, I don’t, but you have to.
Australia gets a Kumar free test, and then him scratching around in the first innings in Hobart.
England gets a man who just manhandled the best team in the world on their home turf, and then he goes home to celebrate Murali’s asterisk and Sanath’s farewell.
The aforementioned players were instrumental, but these days Kumar is the King and everyone else is just a jester.
Talking about Jesters, how come Harmison didn’t play?
Or maybe the better question should be, Harmison, what the fu©k? If I had his talent I’d talk a bigger game than Graeme Smith before a tour of Australia and I’d strut around like a world class peacock all day.
Big day for England tomorrow, if Sri Lanka start to struggle to get wickets I think the should bring the King on to bowl.
He can do everything else.
His recent form is worth a Portman from me. 
